Above is another view of Mr Blackham's unusual Nagra SNN. As far as I can see, apart from not having
" O5 W4 t/ e0 F, [- s
the various anodised legends on the deck plate, also absent are the adjustable AGC threshold knob and
& J- h# C: f' i3 F. g& k
the transport lock-out 'switch' next to the meter. The cover 'hinge' arrangement differs slightly from later
" Q4 i9 H+ w, a% `0 p( \" G. `+ qmachines, as does the 'patina' of the anodised finish. A most interesting version, has anyone got another?
6 f1 j0 C! Q! M5 k9 i r. v" ]( |
# b0 L9 `. m. J1 v
(Apparently yes, I have recently been advised.)
% ]8 M- q1 f0 a3 {8 z
+ u5 N# C5 V6 a1 a7 a' n& Y+ V8 u# x0 x4 o% `5 m; |
Click on either of the above images for more information.
1 n& ^; Z! E" b6 R# ]* ?( @+ J( |: h( a: ^3 n( l
+ n* o0 \ K- D9 ~7 G& ]8 \
* For those who are looking at the stereo versions of this recorder often to be found on 'Eday', do
7 J$ U* w+ L$ \1 B% k: Sbeware, as It is unlikely that these will be the recent versions designed to record high quality music.
2 C; p: {' ?# G3 [
There are now apparently four versions of the Nagra 'SN':
, z! O! |3 Z# L2 G% k- I, Z
- i1 v4 Y9 r& Z/ ]: U. K' ]4 {; `, a5 D. v( e8 H' a# N0 s
Nagra SNN - full track recording at 3 3/4 and 1 7/8 i.p.s. - high quality recording in Mono
. s. @; f9 A# z% @ N$ V+ s" s
& P( C+ i% T' b' E6 UNagra SNS - half track recording at 1 7/8 and 15/16 i.p.s. - surveillance quality recording in Mono
1 e2 ]2 f6 c2 D
8 |6 D; u* C+ x" x. y
Nagra SNST - Stereo recording at 1 7/8 and 15/16 i.p.s. - surveillance quality recording in Stereo
X' N# ] e: m8 f' A. u
. ?0 @' ~6 V) T- \: | j7 eNagra SNSTR (recent) - Stereo recording at 3 3/4 and 1 7/8 i.p.s. - high quality recording in Stereo
" ^4 U$ }! U* L. s k* Z" s
+ V3 l8 N! o3 X0 { Z! l' g: o& o0 J# c8 I& o
Apparently for covert surveillance use it was preferable to have two separate recording channels to
; {9 a! B: _+ _ A4 B/ p
have some chance of capturing a muffled or distant conversations. So these older stereo machines will
& L$ s3 e* i" C6 ^. Y N
therefore be
optimized for speech recording only, and will also
run at low speed for maximum
/ U |+ S3 H# r# ^4 }recording time and not fidelity. Actually Nagra made a special playback loudspeaker system (25100
+ O4 G/ L# a# F1 L! ]/ GDSP) with built in equalization to compensate for the quite limited frequency response of these
N! N+ _! X3 Q0 f4 U) M' A
recorders. A standard mono Nagra SNN running at 3 and 3/4, like the ones on this page are capable of
2 ?2 | ]- R w% `$ g& T0 X4 P- Q3 k
truly Hi-Fi recording, but
the slow speed SNS and the SNST stereo versions are not. Perhaps it might
2 c* P1 v% c# Z6 |6 l8 I) Tbe possible to convert these machines for Hi-Fi use, but this would involve replacing most of the
4 M; J8 w6 H$ Ielectronics and be very expensive.
2 | C( R# k* C5 Q# X( ^1 z& G% z
+ _! h0 C9 F% o7 T
% i8 U4 G% L$ T- W ECheaper to buy a rather bette
r stereo
IV-S in the first place!
: o# r+ Z. X8 D7 g; e6 D) h
% T# [" U; d* e R* M5 _* X
2 H- J% n. E$ Z' U& f9 ]' DTape for the Nagra SN
" M! m1 n( z9 c/ k( h! `: k
- V) [; d; e6 }( M& t) W! q6 e* z" C! p1 S! A- S. u0 ^' I
I have been amazed at the prices some people have been willing to pay on that wild west auction site for
6 V# j+ d9 y5 h
the little reels of tape for this machine. When I first acquired my example from the BBC naturally I
1 K" E0 E& I6 I6 w
wanted to play with it and make some recordings. I knew that the tape was basically re-reeled cassette
5 O0 n; F& B6 r* {: F( W( a
tape so I approached a tape duplication house in the UK and quite easily obtained a few part used
( E$ M9 g9 F4 [. D( o! p8 v& v
'pancakes'. These are the un-flanged bulk reels of tape (about 10" dia) that are automatically wound into
' V* Z4 O1 P; O( _: i
the cassette shells. I then contacted Nagra UK (always helpful) and obtained for around ?5 each
( E8 {: {. C3 e7 w) E( I' t8 o
several pairs of empty plastic reels. It then was quite a simple matter to wind tape off the pancake and
) \; `5 m. G/ E; c) Q! M8 ^, i
onto the Nagra plastic reel (by using the hand crank on the machine). I did this a few years ago and
" F7 M( j! `8 j; h* i% ~
things may be slightly different these days, but perhaps worth investigating rather than spending some
; o* N: n. Z% k- ^/ j; iVERY silly money.
5 I3 a8 t0 f% g" Q; A# L4 }- ]
g( q3 t+ |4 r) g# U
' g$ g b: `! G9 B: w, x