Above is another view of Mr Blackham's unusual Nagra SNN. As far as I can see, apart from not having
: C2 t3 ?( ?6 d4 Z% k) k8 r; c( ythe various anodised legends on the deck plate, also absent are the adjustable AGC threshold knob and
% \ K v4 y% y, f- |
the transport lock-out 'switch' next to the meter. The cover 'hinge' arrangement differs slightly from later
5 C3 a' N2 d- l/ |
machines, as does the 'patina' of the anodised finish. A most interesting version, has anyone got another?
8 o6 Q; g+ t& X) j
+ g% g, @9 @ \# z(Apparently yes, I have recently been advised.)
9 c5 Q2 X( ~: Y" t, W! V; B
" w$ _$ b$ F& M# |7 E+ c3 ~; ~/ T
7 u t, ~% h3 ^7 K: ?# [" S
Click on either of the above images for more information.
9 ~( k3 W: O* \- r" v2 }
# x$ t8 \4 Z) e7 w2 B+ }5 c" |% k- l5 O' L# G b1 ?) {* z& x9 {. d
* For those who are looking at the stereo versions of this recorder often to be found on 'Eday', do
6 j# @! |8 l! i$ Qbeware, as It is unlikely that these will be the recent versions designed to record high quality music.
/ Q- O3 A1 F6 }" N7 c4 Q) C
There are now apparently four versions of the Nagra 'SN':
1 N8 _* N+ e' f4 l
* ~' d; ~3 O! m' d! m
& n. F9 x4 }" q0 I. H" `6 s3 s% PNagra SNN - full track recording at 3 3/4 and 1 7/8 i.p.s. - high quality recording in Mono
. y- D& z/ @0 @+ t. \
$ a4 W! |9 J( e$ o* bNagra SNS - half track recording at 1 7/8 and 15/16 i.p.s. - surveillance quality recording in Mono
8 \. r9 o- b' V, |: `! |- w% s) k7 D6 I- @+ u4 |% Y3 o
Nagra SNST - Stereo recording at 1 7/8 and 15/16 i.p.s. - surveillance quality recording in Stereo
/ n5 h+ U, R) a) T+ x4 ~# L I
6 G8 u& b2 {4 _0 H- S
Nagra SNSTR (recent) - Stereo recording at 3 3/4 and 1 7/8 i.p.s. - high quality recording in Stereo
, o9 B2 X% e8 {. m
/ t. x6 w$ U4 E* c
! c; D2 w! s9 w4 m5 P8 C% ^Apparently for covert surveillance use it was preferable to have two separate recording channels to
0 k" M% G' x4 }
have some chance of capturing a muffled or distant conversations. So these older stereo machines will
& G: ?; [6 y3 @: D/ V# X
therefore be
optimized for speech recording only, and will also
run at low speed for maximum
* ~4 j, E9 ~ [* brecording time and not fidelity. Actually Nagra made a special playback loudspeaker system (25100
5 o3 `# e' X4 |7 [
DSP) with built in equalization to compensate for the quite limited frequency response of these
% W; l1 T7 |: Y1 V8 [; d
recorders. A standard mono Nagra SNN running at 3 and 3/4, like the ones on this page are capable of
7 {& ?$ }9 d+ ^7 `( B, ]truly Hi-Fi recording, but
the slow speed SNS and the SNST stereo versions are not. Perhaps it might
' M5 I' `3 j \$ M0 cbe possible to convert these machines for Hi-Fi use, but this would involve replacing most of the
, U) B& I7 S& a* M) ]( B) T' _$ p
electronics and be very expensive.
2 |1 U* k. B+ H+ b) H4 |
" c. I) O8 K" v" E4 A% W8 K- X3 g
6 ]8 S) J$ z1 Z% m
Cheaper to buy a rather bette
r stereo
IV-S in the first place!
" ]( j6 n2 W2 ]1 g, i0 l. ~% j
9 z& o) i S( w6 v6 F6 T4 u9 m
4 \" A' h9 w% R) x9 D
Tape for the Nagra SN
4 h" B, M8 ~/ Y: z4 ^; u, S
/ ?8 n- b( `% {5 A# d
5 p0 j$ |6 y [9 {8 g* @
I have been amazed at the prices some people have been willing to pay on that wild west auction site for
7 q% y7 k: G' A* X9 ?: rthe little reels of tape for this machine. When I first acquired my example from the BBC naturally I
& u- ^! r9 J) G! t' F5 |3 o
wanted to play with it and make some recordings. I knew that the tape was basically re-reeled cassette
2 \2 A j; p) Y9 p: G8 I! {* {tape so I approached a tape duplication house in the UK and quite easily obtained a few part used
& B. J+ ~. `, r/ Q! [
'pancakes'. These are the un-flanged bulk reels of tape (about 10" dia) that are automatically wound into
& o& B4 v: t! y/ c
the cassette shells. I then contacted Nagra UK (always helpful) and obtained for around ?5 each
" U2 D; m5 H2 ]+ p3 ^, |
several pairs of empty plastic reels. It then was quite a simple matter to wind tape off the pancake and
$ v, g; O& h. A$ |0 |6 ~
onto the Nagra plastic reel (by using the hand crank on the machine). I did this a few years ago and
8 V1 Y+ N0 g( @6 L1 d
things may be slightly different these days, but perhaps worth investigating rather than spending some
' \6 U) U5 D$ D/ a
VERY silly money.
; q* y, v' _2 q) y/ ^
) r7 S7 g7 r% X# m' o, c& ^. X: }7 T$ w/ {- \