Above is another view of Mr Blackham's unusual Nagra SNN. As far as I can see, apart from not having
; c( p* x! e) a( `1 A9 O0 e
the various anodised legends on the deck plate, also absent are the adjustable AGC threshold knob and
7 d7 ] G2 V( Bthe transport lock-out 'switch' next to the meter. The cover 'hinge' arrangement differs slightly from later
0 h4 b6 F6 H4 ^machines, as does the 'patina' of the anodised finish. A most interesting version, has anyone got another?
+ F, i$ D( w9 R7 M3 r& ?3 A2 B5 o" Q9 `* p) {# M3 F5 c8 \
(Apparently yes, I have recently been advised.)
( {- V4 q9 ~, d! m8 L) P* X
9 J4 d: M* w1 c8 g$ v$ D1 v' ?6 ?
6 L) _$ V( w# Y- N) C: C, o
Click on either of the above images for more information.
/ G9 w- U/ k4 f
! ]% h# j6 U0 @- P5 t" F7 Z
! y7 k. ]& M1 @* For those who are looking at the stereo versions of this recorder often to be found on 'Eday', do
! u+ o( q4 \; V5 D" N5 H
beware, as It is unlikely that these will be the recent versions designed to record high quality music.
' W- v9 [9 b5 t |! }$ [There are now apparently four versions of the Nagra 'SN':
8 u' D6 h7 c& C$ q% g& {; o
- r, k% Z8 A m6 V* |3 i6 z: Q" M' L( F2 y' z
Nagra SNN - full track recording at 3 3/4 and 1 7/8 i.p.s. - high quality recording in Mono
: E; v, t, t0 t% x; i4 E* _5 e: Y) c, U8 @6 y
Nagra SNS - half track recording at 1 7/8 and 15/16 i.p.s. - surveillance quality recording in Mono
7 e3 F# I2 P0 i: r' Q* }& o
b- v, f) j, B; }& x- @0 s
Nagra SNST - Stereo recording at 1 7/8 and 15/16 i.p.s. - surveillance quality recording in Stereo
) {) `! ~& F$ A% P# o! N0 Z3 G
! K& v5 Z q+ t( q, z
Nagra SNSTR (recent) - Stereo recording at 3 3/4 and 1 7/8 i.p.s. - high quality recording in Stereo
3 r+ t1 R0 t- J& h4 w4 i0 X: ?1 W0 D3 U
7 S6 n% [" w8 g% `! \1 X
! P0 H: C5 |% q& I4 }- v& [
Apparently for covert surveillance use it was preferable to have two separate recording channels to
" R" |9 U% S3 o2 O; R8 K, s5 R& \
have some chance of capturing a muffled or distant conversations. So these older stereo machines will
/ c [. l) \2 e8 H/ r
therefore be
optimized for speech recording only, and will also
run at low speed for maximum
+ C& J- K0 v7 |2 n7 E9 T; G
recording time and not fidelity. Actually Nagra made a special playback loudspeaker system (25100
8 \. ?- I; r& U/ jDSP) with built in equalization to compensate for the quite limited frequency response of these
! X. {; E8 E8 Q! [# n* G3 R& W
recorders. A standard mono Nagra SNN running at 3 and 3/4, like the ones on this page are capable of
# ]3 _0 L2 g! `, x4 Z# @& d! r1 jtruly Hi-Fi recording, but
the slow speed SNS and the SNST stereo versions are not. Perhaps it might
' r; d9 s) n0 p1 {8 U8 \ c
be possible to convert these machines for Hi-Fi use, but this would involve replacing most of the
8 b$ B& _$ N9 S& f! nelectronics and be very expensive.
; q, Q% E& q' j, n9 b# M0 J: X" F
3 T! H. Z& }& e8 a- ?
X& L# S0 x3 G. h
Cheaper to buy a rather bette
r stereo
IV-S in the first place!
3 A! F" ]* e, Z! g
: c4 Y0 l( k, H5 O) o" r0 q
- z6 A" z. i! o) ]. E& s( A) k& yTape for the Nagra SN
, r4 R# Y+ e6 E$ R$ p, D1 T" V: [4 t& {' P3 U, Y
' I% C: X: C1 k+ N2 r
I have been amazed at the prices some people have been willing to pay on that wild west auction site for
- [/ c) q* W' Z4 o! {; Q
the little reels of tape for this machine. When I first acquired my example from the BBC naturally I
* s- L" t6 j0 c" B; n \wanted to play with it and make some recordings. I knew that the tape was basically re-reeled cassette
: s7 s7 W P. Y4 o, _6 F. wtape so I approached a tape duplication house in the UK and quite easily obtained a few part used
0 V; `% F# \9 {* |7 p'pancakes'. These are the un-flanged bulk reels of tape (about 10" dia) that are automatically wound into
3 N% F* r5 T$ o; s' T. Z
the cassette shells. I then contacted Nagra UK (always helpful) and obtained for around ?5 each
8 E1 b5 W# y. }9 ?1 Z. C
several pairs of empty plastic reels. It then was quite a simple matter to wind tape off the pancake and
8 Y% T4 f7 D! |0 h+ f, n# j$ G
onto the Nagra plastic reel (by using the hand crank on the machine). I did this a few years ago and
2 M r ^( j* ]9 ]6 W
things may be slightly different these days, but perhaps worth investigating rather than spending some
0 a8 r: \# h, I; t
VERY silly money.
i e+ Z2 U5 Z9 q5 F P! p/ U a& Q2 C, W4 W
u8 D% `* Q0 y) G& j