Above is another view of Mr Blackham's unusual Nagra SNN. As far as I can see, apart from not having
* q8 h4 ^# W4 a. Mthe various anodised legends on the deck plate, also absent are the adjustable AGC threshold knob and
; Y/ h" C O: i6 [; G! Sthe transport lock-out 'switch' next to the meter. The cover 'hinge' arrangement differs slightly from later
3 _4 x) L: q. ? K, y9 a+ @4 ^% b
machines, as does the 'patina' of the anodised finish. A most interesting version, has anyone got another?
. ?' i" r! H f. G1 U! s
5 B" M6 d h0 w6 y/ L( t& U5 b) I) T" p
(Apparently yes, I have recently been advised.)
# g& X: j) B" o; O& v+ O G2 N
" O3 k$ C: I# C0 e3 i# l: [. j
( `/ e3 {4 m6 w l5 I. K2 K
Click on either of the above images for more information.
2 M3 c1 k0 T" j7 N' O0 }
* S6 S- U$ L# e/ H a+ }8 d; P" H6 i: z8 t! t; ~' p" i& [
* For those who are looking at the stereo versions of this recorder often to be found on 'Eday', do
% S2 K; K$ o! m5 _: M4 x) W* ]
beware, as It is unlikely that these will be the recent versions designed to record high quality music.
; ?' `/ {& p1 |% `5 Q
There are now apparently four versions of the Nagra 'SN':
) p9 P w! O, x" |% ^! p/ W& V# j, s% o3 [4 d
; ]/ N' Y3 ^/ Z T
Nagra SNN - full track recording at 3 3/4 and 1 7/8 i.p.s. - high quality recording in Mono
6 I I3 {- C* @5 H" W! N
8 ]; |! G* E% q7 PNagra SNS - half track recording at 1 7/8 and 15/16 i.p.s. - surveillance quality recording in Mono
1 ^1 u; T. a+ \& f: C6 X
' z1 z [( x$ b. _9 {Nagra SNST - Stereo recording at 1 7/8 and 15/16 i.p.s. - surveillance quality recording in Stereo
; W9 K) U6 S- f' A m8 a! }
0 e6 C- a" ?8 G5 s0 W
Nagra SNSTR (recent) - Stereo recording at 3 3/4 and 1 7/8 i.p.s. - high quality recording in Stereo
$ w; \$ ~, m* x, u
2 c+ n6 M T6 ^9 i/ }. u; n3 r$ d% {, ]+ h% i8 B6 C
Apparently for covert surveillance use it was preferable to have two separate recording channels to
% j1 G' j# p2 D! w. B
have some chance of capturing a muffled or distant conversations. So these older stereo machines will
/ k/ E0 g, m3 X9 j' D/ e; O- Dtherefore be
optimized for speech recording only, and will also
run at low speed for maximum
( |! {( Q5 W0 p1 [7 X+ L% W- U/ w
recording time and not fidelity. Actually Nagra made a special playback loudspeaker system (25100
. j% b9 O& _5 ~7 d# g6 P2 cDSP) with built in equalization to compensate for the quite limited frequency response of these
; v' `/ x( ~, X% \recorders. A standard mono Nagra SNN running at 3 and 3/4, like the ones on this page are capable of
, v, x9 r3 t1 T+ B7 d0 dtruly Hi-Fi recording, but
the slow speed SNS and the SNST stereo versions are not. Perhaps it might
9 X1 \% H; Y0 T+ M9 x- E. J' n
be possible to convert these machines for Hi-Fi use, but this would involve replacing most of the
8 }: l+ z1 T3 a2 F# |electronics and be very expensive.
& G# _. r" k- M( E7 Y0 F
% S1 G P- {: ]* C' Y! q& t1 |4 | ?" T5 y! [9 u5 ?
Cheaper to buy a rather bette
r stereo
IV-S in the first place!
2 ~; |0 ^- _1 G, ^: a3 _% o
; c3 v. z" A2 ]6 l# d u( Q& N
4 A" H4 ]0 Q3 K# L7 o! A+ }# V) k/ CTape for the Nagra SN
& @& G, A3 x+ F1 [) Z$ P. K, [1 ~) D. `$ h( I7 ?% f2 U
) n* S2 G/ ]4 A' n
I have been amazed at the prices some people have been willing to pay on that wild west auction site for
+ p7 J K) T5 M$ p9 b& o) P
the little reels of tape for this machine. When I first acquired my example from the BBC naturally I
" x* `' @; C, M' }. Q. \wanted to play with it and make some recordings. I knew that the tape was basically re-reeled cassette
: U* b! Z h' {8 g- ?
tape so I approached a tape duplication house in the UK and quite easily obtained a few part used
2 E2 r* s" W. E'pancakes'. These are the un-flanged bulk reels of tape (about 10" dia) that are automatically wound into
3 s: @+ c5 G1 |, R+ o
the cassette shells. I then contacted Nagra UK (always helpful) and obtained for around ?5 each
! E& j Y& u0 @$ [, F6 y, c3 T
several pairs of empty plastic reels. It then was quite a simple matter to wind tape off the pancake and
/ o3 ?7 B, N2 O8 O1 V3 @onto the Nagra plastic reel (by using the hand crank on the machine). I did this a few years ago and
# h) g- p! W" x( R1 `things may be slightly different these days, but perhaps worth investigating rather than spending some
?, {6 h" q7 q) r
VERY silly money.
5 t; y- K+ C8 S" X6 O6 F* O% g) M0 b6 L1 C
: T. x( f" r' i: h2 _